Orthodynamic Headphones & all things planar

I was not able to extend listening session last night, as my kid woke up and started crying. I hope I will do some better comparisons today.
For now I feel yamaha >~ tp > hd 650 in musicality. Bass on TPs was initially less, but with some increase in volume, it caught up, coming close to yamaha.
 
late night is the only time you can have to yourself. That is the reason I am focusing more on headphone system than on speakers.
 
Rotel RH-930 back-electret headphones

I haven't posted in a while since I have been a bit busy.
Today I present a rather unique & rare planar headphone : Rotel RH-930 back-electret headphones.
This is an OEM version of Toshiba HR-910.

The transformer is built into the TRS plug & so it can be used with usual dynamic amplifiers.

dsc0194ny.jpg

dsc0199kd.jpg

dsc0204i.jpg

dsc0212m.jpg

dsc0230bw.jpg




Some of you would know that the Electrets are cheaper versions of electrostatic headphones.Most electrets are considered infereior to the 'electrostats' but back-electrets are a bit different. Check this wikiphonia link for electret driver principle:

From an engineering standpoint, the ideal diaphragm material is a polyester called boPET, biaxially-oriented polyethylene terephthalate film, aka Mylar or Hostaphan or Melinex. Problem is, boPET doesn't make a very good electret. So an engineer must either accept a compromise in the sound, or he can re-engineer the typical electrostatic headphone layout by metallizing a boPET diaphragm and applying the audio signal to it and relegating the electret material to the stators where its inferior mechanical properties won't matter. This inside-out or back-electret design was used by only two manufacturers: Toshiba (most notably the HR 910; Rotel also marketed an OEM model) and Audio-Technica (the ATH-8, aka the Signet TK33).

About the Sound :
The first thing that struck me was how smooth they were in mids & treble. I can't seem to pick any major peak/dip in there frequency response.I can play them as loud as I can from my amp & they don't get shouty.
The Treble is very extended & without a hint of that plasticky sound that seems to bug most dynamic cans.
In the stock form they have significant bass roll-off starting from 175 Hz & lower meaning that one would miss the mid-bass & that the male vocals sounded a bit thin.
I improved the backwave seal of the cans & that has cured the vocals. The bass still rolls off but most of it is now in sub-bass region & doesn't hurt the the timbre of most instruments.
All in all, a welcome addition to the planar family at my home. :)
 
Last edited:
I usually say that my headphones sound much better than they look. In this case, they look good too.:cool:
 
Just a heads up for folks her.
I shall be putting couple of my headphones on sale in the next few days.
1)Yamaha HP50S (ortho)
2)Rotel RH-930 ( Back-electret)
Those interested, kindly PM me.
 
don't get too greedy :) Maybe you can lend it for a few days in that case. The amp now sits on my office desk paired with hp50s and streamer II dac. I can now find some time to listen to it.
Any progress on dac build?
 
:eek: Even that price doesn't dissuade you from trying.

You are welcome to drop by & listen to NAD as much as you want but It isn't going to leave my place for even a day. Sorry !

About the DAC : the newly released Buffalo III has added alot more to the cost of building.
It would cost atleast $600, which is beyoound my current budget.
 
Last edited:
Great News, Ananth !
Didn't see the post earlier because there is something wrong with thread subscription link.

Pics & impression please. :)
 
impressions are great. Lots of details, midrange is great. don't find any shortcoming in limited listening till now. And they are much more efficient than yamahas. I hope to listen more to it in next few days.

The amp we have is VERY good too :)
 
Buy from India's official online dealer!
Back
Top