For your info
B&W ROTEL CLASSE are built by same manufacturer
that counts for nothing. fiat owns ferrari, chrysler and mercedez are together.
i personally never liked rotel. your mileage may vary.
how about emotiva.
For your info
B&W ROTEL CLASSE are built by same manufacturer
I hope the OP i[ @ nowahat? ] is aware that there are 2 shapes in which the Matrix 805 exists - i.e. 805-H and 805-V. There's a Horizontal ver mainly to have them sit on Studio Desks on Monitoring Desktops while there are Vertical ver meant for stand mounting.
@2channelfeak....
except where will the OP find any of the stuff you have mentioned...
your thread is long
B&W ROTEL CLASSE are built by same manufacturer
2chFreak, Thanks for your informative posts. Especially about the BAF since I didn't realize it was so essential. After reading your's and koushik's posts, I wondered if I had acquired a white elephant, but on reading it a few more times I realized that all of you are so helpful.
I have the vertical one. I read the manual and they say it can be placed on a flat surface or on stands. I have a large-ish teak wood unit which is around 3 feet in height and 7 feet across and I plan to place it on that.
I have some questions about how to sort-of refurbish the speaker which I was planning to ask later since
- there are few paint droplets on the cabinet which aren't going away,
- one tweeter has a problem (the silver thing in front just after the grille is depressed),
- the yellow woofers are dusty,
- the legs of the speaker (the small plastic rounds) have melted in the Indian heat apparently,
- the tweeters are detached but the wiring was never cut (It sits back in fine -- was planning to use some superglue like Fevikwik to stick them).
Classe seems to be much too powerful for my needs. I am warming up to Rotel though I still can't get used to the way it looks.
i personally never liked rotel. your mileage may vary.
how about emotiva.
Though Rotel & Classe are brands that have been acquired by B&W, personally - Rotel is not my preference. I've always felt Rotel's traits are way "too unrefined" for the very sober Matrix-800 series that deserves much more. I prefer to look at more warmer, more liquid, wider bandwidth with more effective higher current handling capacity electronics to partner these speakers. And they really deserve 'em. The better the electronics, superior will be the sonics ..
Odyssey amps also comes to mind esp. some of their amps with higher current handling capabilities. Klaus Bunge, Odyssey owner has good experience with B&Ws as he also distributes Symphonic Line (made in Germany) in the United States & tries to incorporate some of those traits in his amps. More of it in his Kismet line.
- one tweeter has a problem (the silver thing in front just after the grille is depressed),
- the tweeters are detached but the wiring was never cut (It sits back in fine -- was planning to use some superglue like Fevikwik to stick them).
What I liked most about the 805 was probably the tweeter which sounded detailed to me even though some people find it harsh. With my Onkyo amplifier I initially did not get any bass but when I cranked up the volume, that too come to life. Generally I liked the level of detail hearing sounds I hadn't heard before.
I have heard a friends NAD C370 + B&W 602 S3 combination sound excellent. This was almost 10 years ago.
Hi
An Arcam will work better to my ears with most B&W (definately the latter ones) as it will tame a bit of the tizz & zing of the alum tweeter. Rotel (owned both RB 1080 & RB 1090 for a short while many years ago) to me just wont do. The Marantz that you mention is also not the best match. Bryston that manav suggested works well in most aspects (3b is enough, no need for 4B) BUT the upper end may be too forward but then thats a personal call that you have to hear & make.
Bought the 804D for a relative recently and its driven by the Accuphase E 460 and it is good in most aspects.
Rgds