Which JBL's are you preferring over the TAD's and ennumerate/explain reason also if possibleI am using modern tad evolution one, but still prefer my jbls
jbl L300,i still prefer some songs in jbl ove tadsWhich JBL's are you preferring over the TAD's and ennumerate/explain reason also if possible
Which JBL's are you preferring over the TAD's and ennumerate/explain reason also if possible
Nice!! He is to the point where he listen to the music than nit picking and enjoys them.Now there is a trend where the manufacturers are introducing some of there new lineups based on vintage speakers e.g., klh(Model 5), mission audio(770),JBL(L100 and 4312se),Klipsch(Heritage series)and elipson(xls15).Not sure how they would sound but trying to revive the vintage series.Charm of a vintage JBL speaker explained by a user
I am using tad evolution one floor standing spks, they have Be hf and concentric mid, sounds fantastic. Resolution and sound stage is amazing
Pioneer is not supposed to be paired with Yamaha, Also Yamaha AX 590 is in in Vintage league.Pioneer does with Sansui,NAD, Denon . As mentioned earlier Matching vintage is a art and it takes time and experiment to find the best synergy.After reading all the posts in this thread, I got tempted and borrowed a Pioneer vintage speaker CS 609 and paired it with my Yamaha AX 590. Big sound. Very loud. Room filling bass. But....I think I will stay with my Spendor and Chario. Vintage is not my cup of tea.
Sorry to differ in your opinion. Japan Vintage stuff were more into Receivers and Amps and they had little focus for Speakers TAD,Diatone,Yamaha only made good line ups and Sony\pioneer\sansui\Panasonic speakers just to above average but worth for the money we pay.The Japanese vintage speakers are usually a waste of time. Exceptions are the Pioneer TAD exclusive ones, two models of Technics, couple of models of Diatone.
In JBL, try and hear the L 300/4333, 4343, 4344, 4345, 4350. These are all very very good. You get the big sound, dynamics with the resolution of today’s speakers.
Vintage WE speakers, Altec VOTT, Tannoy GRF, Klipsch Horn, Vitavox. These are also super speakers.
About 25-30 speakers from the 60s and 70s are worth listening to. Rest I wouldn’t bother.
Sorry to differ in your opinion. Japan Vintage stuff were more into Receivers and Amps and they had little focus for Speakers TAD,Diatone,Yamaha only made good line ups and Sony\pioneer\sansui\Panasonic speakers just to above average but worth for the money we pay.
British and US Speakers were good compared to Japanese speakers, Agree to your statement
+1 to the above.I still believe paper is the best material for woofer and midrange drivers
So true..hence need to buy carefully, from renowned sources or be the type who does not mind getting hands dirty with some little DIY+1 to the above.
The vintage speakers are not without problems, after all these 40+ years of usage / non usage , the spider, surrounds and capacitors in the X over would have worn out and in many models the spares are not available, if that is the case, then there is a huge compromise in sound quality. Luckily spares for Altec, JBL and Tannoy are available as of now, but at a premium cost.
After 40+ years any speaker would probably need a rebuild.+1 to the above.
The vintage speakers are not without problems, after all these 40+ years of usage / non usage , the spider, surrounds and capacitors in the X over would have worn out and in many models the spares are not available, if that is the case, then there is a huge compromise in sound quality. Luckily spares for Altec, JBL and Tannoy are available as of now, but at a premium cost.
That's the usual experience with many vintage speakers. Like a few others rightly pointed out, seeking out certain models from the past is the right way to go. And pairing them with the right kind of amplification. Some of those good ones are sought after by people who prioritise performance over anything else. Just some food for thought.After reading all the posts in this thread, I got tempted and borrowed a Pioneer vintage speaker CS 609 and paired it with my Yamaha AX 590. Big sound. Very loud. Room filling bass. But....I think I will stay with my Spendor and Chario. Vintage is not my cup of tea.
luckly the vintage jbl had spares in ebay like spiders and voice coils and diaphragms, i kept a spare diaphragma and complete recone kit as a spare for my jbl l300, i hope the spare will available in next decade also, i had done some extensive listening between jbl l300 and TAD Evolution one, each had their own adv and drawbacks. i still prefer jbls for my musical tasts of ghazals and old songs, but the dinamics and microdetails from tad are unbeatable.i have changed crossover of jbl l300 to nelson pass crossover,so no crossover components aging.That's the usual experience with many vintage speakers. Like a few others rightly pointed out, seeking out certain models from the past is the right way to go. And pairing them with the right kind of amplification. Some of those good ones are sought after by people who prioritise performance over anything else. Just some food for thought.
The very fact that someone has a JBL L300 in the same room as a high end TAD says something !
Personal preference also plays a part in all this. Mastering and recording practices in the past have been influenced by the trends and high end equipment available those days.. especially the good ones. Hence a lot of music music from the past tend to sound better on high end speakers from the past. If your music spans many decades, it is good to have two pairs of speakers.