Been watching movies like crazy in the past few nights. Here's a short summary:
Silent Films: Chaplin's "The Kid" (1921), "A Dog's Life" (1918), "Circus" (1928) - of which I liked
Circus. It was supposed to be one of the not-so-funny movies of Chaplin. But, I liked it. The kid's performance in
The Kid was interesting, but then I did not like it as much.
Film-noir: This is one genre I always wanted to see, but never did...so far. I have only watched "China Town" and "Maltese Falcon" in this genre.
Double Indemnity (1944): A fast talking insurance agent, a bad girl in marriage to a wealthy man, a double indemnity accident insurance (that gives double the life coverage under certain conditions) and a very shrewd insurance investigator whose "little man" always tells him when something's wrong - mix it all up and you got "Double Indemnity".
The Big Sleep (1946): Humphrey Bogart may not be the greatest of actors, but he sure has a great voice that has a personality of it's own. I'm yet to see a (at least among old ones) film where if you lose attention for a few mins, you lose track of the plot. Various characters are introduced at lightning speed without giving a chance to get familiarized. The only man who seems to have some bit of understanding is Det. Philip Marlowe (Bogart). He outwits and sees through every other character in the process. Some have called this a "confusing film". It's not so, but it's easy to get lost in the sea of characters and the links between them if you are not so attentive.
Also caught up on Capra's
It Happened One night (1934) and
It's a wonderful life (1946), both of which I liked in varying degrees. In deference to their respective IMDB ratings, I liked the former better.
Not so liked...
The Third Man (1949): This film has been in many "best of.." list I came across. It is shot very well in Vienna, features Orson Wells in a near cameo, but.... it's the zither constantly playing through out that got to me. Never has music dictated how I like a particular movie - in the end, it got on my nerves. Besides, it did not interest me what Holly Martins dug up on Harry Lime.
In a IMDB thread, someone mentioned that people do not "get"
The Third man or
2001. I say, 30 mins with monkeys, monolith and no dialogues - bring it on any day - I'd love it
. But somehow I don't "get" what's so special about
The Third man. Someone else mentioned that he watched this film 5 times to "understand the greatness". I'm going to pass that opportunity and see 4 other "great" films
Next up - the
4 3 films likely will be - Fritz Lang's Metropolis (1927), Faust (Murnau, 1926), von Strohiem's Greed (1924) - if possible, the 4 hour restored version and in film-noir
, Sunset Blvd., (1950)
Any more recommendations?
Edit:
Sunset Blvd (1950)
Yet another Billy Wilder movie that begins with the ending and shows what led to it. Norma Desmond (Gloria Swanson) is a forgotten silent movie star of 20 years ago. Joe Gillis (William Holden), a broke script writer accidentally enters her mansion in order to save his car from the finance men chasing him. With practically no outside contact, the actress is trapped in an illusive world where she is still a star, trying to make her "return" with the script she is writing all these years. With no job and lot of money being offered, Gillis agrees to be a ghost writer. Then he truly begins to understand the obsessive nature of Norma. He wants to escape her clutches, but is not ready to leave her money.
To me, this on first viewing at least, does not strike as a great film. Sure, it's a good film, but #32 on IMDB Top 250? The dramatic acting of Gloria Swanson did not sit well with me. But, it's understandable since in the movie, Norma is a star 24 x 7 and a silent era one at that. It's an illustration of how success gets to your head and no matter what you still want to be in the spotlight. Hmmm... reminds me of "The Wrestler", which I liked much better. Anyways, to each his own (taste) and this won't be the first or the last time my taste disagrees with IMDB ratings.