It is a very old methodology still being done in the new era of plasmas. Plasmas used to have all the bad burn-ins in the world like 10 years ago. Those required extensive breakin procedure. The half life was 7 years at maz to start with.
We both seem to be talking about the same thing but in circles!
Yes it is old, but just because it is old does not mean it is redundant. Running slides is not just about fighting burn-ins / IR. It is widely used till today because it evenly ages the phosphors. Like you said in your own post, the TV will age differently in different parts if it is used to display anything other than slides during the first 200 hours.
I suppose you did the research already. Can you post it for the benefit of others? What is the advantage of using slides? How is it more useful than say, a TV static I mentioned?
The reason it is recommended by the pros is because it ages every single pixel across the screen evenly. When you say you have completed 200 hours after running in slides, that means every single pixel has been stressed at the same level for 200 hours and the panel truly has been uniformly stressed. When you use the TV to watch other content, then it's goes without saying that all pixels have not been stressed at the same level and that they are different points in their ageing process.
Another reason to do this is because you can achieve the best calibration especially when you use a spectrometer with software like CalMAN. If you have used your TV to watch regular programming then the spectrometer will pick up the differences in ageing and light / color output between the pixels of the panel.
People use TV static (also called snow) to fight IR but not to evenly age the panel since it is monochrome and not really a static image which is what pro's recommend when breaking in a TV. There might be other reasons as to why they don't use "snow" to break-in a TV (not being able to run the pixels through a full color gamut etc.) that I am not aware off.
Put this in your first post. A lot of people who are in this thread do that stating your first post.
First of all, posts here cannot be modified after a few hours have passed. Secondly, even if it could be, I wouldn't change it because my first post gives people both options which automatically means that I am not condoning one method over the other. It is purely a matter of personal choice, the operative word being "choice".
Agreed, But for most people, watching "some" content is better than watching "slides". All Iam saying is dont run the slides ALONE for 200 hours. Accelerating the uniform ageing process through any method is accepted when you are NOT viewing content.
Again this is matter of personal choice. I don't get why you are so strongly stressing and insisting that people don't run slides ALONE for the first 100 / 200 hours. It's up to them. If they don't mind not watching any TV programming for a week or so in order to get the perfectly exercised panel, why should we advice them otherwise, unless of course there is something wrong with it. I don't think either of us is as qualified as D-Nice to be offering a concrete statement on the subject.
I completely understand your point of view, but all I am saying is that you shouldn't make it sound like running slides is WRONG! Purists would always love to get the best possible picture and calibration. Take your example, despite so many settings available around the forum, you still had to tweak the TV and then tweak it some more till you found it to be acceptable viewing while most of us here were happy with the stock settings. Running slides is the penultimate way of getting the best picture. Is it something that the average user needs? Well that's always up for debate.
I'm an average user, but knowing that I got everything done right leaves me more contented even though I might never really be able to tell the difference.
Anyways this will be my last post on the subject. People are free to do their own research on the pros and cons of slides. I suggest we return this thread to the more pertinent issues like usage hours and firmware issues and calibration settings... you know... the fun stuff