The story of a tourist family in Thailand caught in the destruction and chaotic aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.
The Impossible (2012) - IMDb
V.
The story of a tourist family in Thailand caught in the destruction and chaotic aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.
The Impossible (2012) - IMDb
V.
The much imitated heist sequence is over 32 minutes long and contains not a single line of dialogue or music. The production crew and composer Georges Auric thought it would be a disaster to have such a long sequence sans dialogue. Auric insisted that he allow him to write a grand piece of music for the scene and he eventually did on his own. Later Dassin played the part for Auric twice, once with the score, once without. Auric turned to him and admitted, "Without the music".
Taste of Cherry (1997)
Can't write much about the film due to lack of spoilers tag here (why don't we have mentions and spoiler tag?). After watching it, I feel that the so called 'Koker Trilogy' have more in common than "Taste of Cherry".
In a word? dry. That is the first word that popped into my mind. It is among the most detached movies I've watched in a long time.
We are shown a man driving a truck looking for someone. He stops the range rover, looks at people, drives on. But, we are not sure about why he wants them and what he intends to do. The first person who eventually gets into his truck is told the truth, which is bit more 'digestible' compared to what we 'think' he could be. There is lot of driving around the roads of the dusty hills for a vast majority of the film. There are some beautiful, silent shots in the middle, but there's lot more of talk with the view of the RR turning around the bends. The only time there is any scenery is when it's relevant to the mood of the film. In the hands of another director, this would be all about the protoganist - his back story, why, how and what led to his situation. Who knows? It could even have become a dark comedy or a thriller in hollywood. Purposefully, Kiarostami does not go there at all - we are as much in the dark at the end of the film as at the beginning of who Badii is and why he decides to do what he is about to - an aspect very much to my liking. The ending is a bit ambiguous with visuals and sound guiding us about what may have happened (just like '... Olive....').
Ebert felt it was pretentious crap (one star rating, one less than 'Twilight', 2 less than 'You don't mess with Zohan'). I think I 'get it', but at the same time I could at no point 'love' it. It's one of those movies where repeated viewing may alter the perception one way or another. Only for the very patient.