So, last week I proceeded to complete the plan as I mentioned
here
Black Swan (2010)
Pratters has already covered it well
here. Aronofsky keeps impressing me with every movie. From the junkies in 'Requiem' to the washed out wrestler trying to relive his old glory once again to this (have not watched "Pi" and "The Fountain"), I feel the link is obsession (drugs in requiem, glory in wrestler, artistic achievement in Black swan) and a downward spiral (literally in requiem, health and relationships in wrestler, blurring reality and imagination here) and some dedication as well. But, "Requiem" because of it's content is still had the most impact of the three on me.
Amores Perros (2000)
Three stories interlinked by an accident, dog(s), love (of various forms). It's a really well made film and I liked it more than "Black swan", though I suspect it would be the reverse for most others.
Battleship Potemkin (1925)
This is a Soviet propaganda film. The segment called "Odessa Staircase" which portrays the soldiers massacre of people on the lo..ng Odessa staircases is what defines the film for me. The baby in a carriage falling down the stairs would make it's appearance again in "The Untouchables" though it's more brutal in 'Potemkin'. On a side note, I happened to watch "Naked Gun 33 1/3" before "Untouchables", so Kevin Costner just did not stand a chance against the dead pan acting of Leslie Nielsen as all I could remember was '33 1/3' during that scene
Man bites Dog (1992)
A violent mockumentary about a serial killer in which the crew goes from observers to accomplices to co-offenders interspersed with comments on anything from architecture to birds. But I will remember this for the performance of Benot Poelvoorde. But as a movie, it did not impact me greatly as I expected.
In the Mood for Love (2000)
Having never watched a Wang Kar Wai film, I did not know what to expect. Amazing visuals, great music and it unfolds like a poetry in motion at places. It ends without the closure one normally expects from romantic films and I liked it.
3-Iron (2004)
My second Kim Ki-Duk film after "Bad Guy". I love the way he keeps the number of words from lead character's to a bare minimum. Most of what needs to be said is conveyed by looks and actions. It's the other characters who need to talk. A strangely beautiful love story that can be interpreted as carrying a spiritual message.
Umberto D (1952)
Just like I got potty trained, I got pathos trained watching many Sivaji films on TV
. So, this last of Italian neo-realistic films reminded a LOT of Tamil films of those days. I was thinking 'Add 2 pages of dialog here, insert a sad song by TMS here and we got ourselves a tear-jerker'. But what happens with "Umberto D", even with it's amateur actors is that the fine line is never crossed somehow by Vittorio De Sica. There are some memorable scenes like when Umberto decides to ask for money, but turns around his hand at the last minute and instead makes his dog stand with his hat - it's both sad and light-hearted at the same time. But overall, it did not affect me to the extent I expected.
The Human Condition
This is a big self assignment I've been postponing for almost a year and a half now. It had to finally happen. Clocking at a combined 579 minutes, it's not easy to allocate time to watch 'Human Condition' (mentioned by someone that it actually translates to "Condition of being human" which makes more sense too). Directed by Masaki Kobayashi with Tatsuya Nakadai ("Ran", "Kagemusha", "Yojimbo", "Sanjuro", "High and Low") in the lead, this was not easy to watch. The movie is split into 3 films with each part split further into 2 parts each. Since there were 6 parts, it was easier for me to spread it over Saturday, Sunday and Monday to finish. So what was the big result?
I found Kurosawa appealed to me better as he was more visual, technical, involving. Seven Samurai, which was just short of the first part by just a minute was more of a cinematic experience; could be just Toshiro Mifune entertaining in every one of his scenes.
This was more like reading the novel on which the movie is based on. The first part of the Trilogy, which is the longest felt more like the beginning of something big and better to me. The second was better than the first and the third is where the pay-off for all the time spent on watching the trilogy occurs. Is it a good film? By all means. It's a bit more realistic about war. In the first part, Kaji the humanist, watches the war from sidelines while being subject to some of it's ill effects. He attempts to treat the Chinese laborers with humanity gaining nothing from either side in return. Labeled a 'Red' by the Japanese and not completely trusted by the Chinese, he is enlisted in the army against his wishes. In the second, Kaji tries to fight his way through the oppression within the army, but he is transforming towards the end. In the third, when the war is already over, he sets out to get back to his wife Michiko against all odds and doing anything and everything necessary.
I don't know why, but my emotional investment in Kaji was a little less than ideal. Lot of characters to remember, long running time - that must have did me in. I was more a dispassionate witness to his journey than a fellow traveler. That's why I won't call this trilogy a Classic - at least until I watch it again by a miracle and love it the next time.